Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital hearing 
aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding of sound be 
any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those who are not? By that 
I mean you encode the way you want and the way you like but one thing I do know 
when wearing good hearing instruments is that you want the best quality sound 
you can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use VBR quality and I did 
post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and what all the settings 
meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it if you look in the 
archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the minimum bit rate to as low 
as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high as possible.  There are 2 
quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to be changed according to what 
you're encoding but a good setting for music is "3", the lower the number then 
the less the encoder rejects from the encoding.  If you set the VBR quality to 
"1" then you may as well use a lossless compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint 
stereo.

Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.


On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:

> Hello all,
> I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids literally 
> today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality. By that I 
> mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
> Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> 
> -- 
> Sent using Thunderbird
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to