According to what you say, flak is no better than WMA lossless. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Matzura Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 6:31 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:35:44 +1100, you wrote: >FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR WITH >FLAC. Well, it's supposed to be. I've never read any test reports that say what comes out equals what went in. I can only hope it's that way. Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
