Hi,
Yes, it's fully accessible as someone noted - even versions 10 and 11... I'm 
using version 11 and JFW 6.2 with no problems.
also, as a side note, if you're primarily interseted in quality and will 
only playback using the comp, try ripping in WMA format. It sounds beter 
than MP3, at least to me it does...



Best Regards,
Cornell




----Original Message Follows----
From: "GianniP46" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: PC Audio Discussion List <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Subject: windows media
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:29:38 -0400

Is windows media accessible?  Does it produce good mp3s?  What version 
should I try.
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Kevin Lloyd
   To: PC Audio Discussion List
   Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 8:27 AM
   Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


   Hi.

   Windows media player has error correction so be sure to set it if you're
   using this program to rip audio CD's.  It will rip much more slowly when
   this is enabled but you will get excellent results.

   To set the error correction flag,
   go to tools, options and locate the audio tab.  Press enter on the
   properties button for your CD/DVD drives and then check the checkboxes to
   set error correction on.

   The CD transport in your computer is key to getting good results.  As
   mentioned, EAC will scan until it finds 2 close matches in extracted WAV
   forms but that doesn't mean that it's perfect as if your CD transport 
isn't
   great then you'll get some very close imperfect WAV files and it'll have
   just taken you longer to get there.

   I've found laptops have the best CD transports as they tend to have a 
raised
   middle onto which you can press the CD and have it held firmly.  CD
   transports I've seen on desktops have been quite flimsy at times and the
   disc can slide about when spinning.  This is a great way to generate lots 
of
   jitter, particularly on the latter tracks which are on the outside of the
   disc and so are therefore being rocked around a lot more than the inner
   tracks on a flimsy transport.

   Regards.

   Kevin
   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "GianniP46" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
   Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:48 AM
   Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


   > Does winamp, windows media, or ITunes have error correction, wave form
   > comparison, or rescanning of tracks?  Or is eac the only program that 
does
   > this.  Will definitely look in to it.
   >  ----- Original Message -----
   >  From: Kelly Pierce
   >  To: PC Audio Discussion List
   >  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:26 PM
   >  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
   >
   >
   >  Not necessarily.  CDEX doesn't have error correction and wave form
   >  comparison, rescanning the same track two dozen times.  EAC can often
   >  salvage a scratched disc.  there is much discussion on the Internet
   >  comparing the two programs, check it out.
   >
   >  Kelly
   >
   >  ----- Original Message -----
   >  From: "GianniP46" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   >  To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
   >  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:49 PM
   >  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
   >
   >
   >  >a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows 
media
   >  >player at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings 
wont
   >  >that be just as good if not better?
   >  >  ----- Original Message -----
   >  >  From: Kelly Pierce
   >  >  To: PC Audio Discussion List
   >  >  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
   >  >  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >  if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact 
Audio
   >  > copy
   >  >  with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame,
   >  > variable
   >  >  bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness
   > when
   >  > it
   >  >  is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer
   > calls
   >  >  this setting insane.
   >  >
   >  >  EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly 
identical
   >  > wave
   >  >  forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a
   > tract,
   >  >  dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not 
perform
   >  > this
   >  >  error checking analysis.
   >  >
   >  >  If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to 
learn,
   >  > but
   >  >  the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip
   > audio
   >  >  books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.
   >  >
   >  >  Kelly
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >  ----- Original Message -----
   >  >  From: "GianniP46" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   >  >  To: "PCAudioList" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
   >  >  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
   >  >  Subject: Some CDEX questions
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >  > Hi,
   >  >  > I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the
   >  > configuration
   >  >  > options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my
   >  > bitrates
   >  >  > to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates
   > are
   >  > the
   >  >  > best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
   >  >  > Is it good to enable jitter correction?
   >  >  > Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create 
the
   >  > best
   >  >  > mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a
   > D.J.
   >  >  > and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!
   >  >  >
   >  >  >
   >  >  >
   >  >  > Gian Carlo Pedulla
   >  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >  >  >
   >  >  > LETS! GO! METS!
   >  >  >
   >  >  > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   >  >  > http://www.pc-audio.org
   >  >  >
   >  >  > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   >  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   >  >  http://www.pc-audio.org
   >  >
   >  >  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   >  >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >  >
   >  >
   >  >  --
   >  >  No virus found in this incoming message.
   >  >  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
   >  >  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date:
   > 9/3/2007
   >  > 9:31 AM
   >  >
   >  >
   >  > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   >  > http://www.pc-audio.org
   >  >
   >  > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >
   >
   >
   >  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   >  http://www.pc-audio.org
   >
   >  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >
   >
   >  --
   >  No virus found in this incoming message.
   >  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
   >  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 
9/3/2007
   > 9:31 AM
   >
   >
   > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   > http://www.pc-audio.org
   >
   > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >



   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org

   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   --
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
   Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 
9:31 AM

Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to