You think they charge to much, $.79 a track? I'm not a JFW user, so I am asking, why aren't playlists accessible with JFW when there perfectly accessible with Window-Eyes? Also, Rhapsody is not a download service, so you aren't downloading files to your pc that you can transfer to a portable device. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 1:44 AM Subject: RE: rapsody vs emusic.com
> Rhapsody is usable enough. If you value play lists more than anything else > you may be disappointed. I haven't bothered to try to figure out how to get > the play lists working with JAWS. > > Also, if you need to burn cds or copy the files to a portable player then > Rhapsody is definitely a problem. I think they charge too much for burning > cds. But if you just want to listen to streaming music and want a good > selection and a slightly problematic, but usable interface then Rhapsody > might be best. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 1:03 PM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: rapsody vs emusic.com > > > Hi, I find that rapsody has a better offer for a subscription > service, however i played with rapsody once and found it not that usable. > Is it very good or would emusic be better? > > > > _______________________________________________ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
