+1 for dropping 4 Regarding 5.9 what distros/versions is it not yet readily available on? If nothing major, then +1 as well.
On Jun 8, 2017 2:43 AM, "MicK7" <[email protected]> wrote: +1 for qt 5.9 And thanks for the great job on 5.4 release. Mickael PHILIT On 06/06/2017 18:44, Michael Jackson wrote: > +1. > Also I would vote to jump all the way to Qt 5.9 since it is a LTS release > and you can stabilize on Qt 5.9 for the next 3 years at least where as Qt > 5.6 is only supported in a security bug fix from here on for another 2 > years. I don't think Qt is going to add support for newer operating systems > so if something breaks on newer releases of macOS or Windows Qt made it > sound like they would not fix Qt 5.6 > > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensou rce/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
