(Responding back to the group.)

Well, that's strange. That should work.

I notice that you originally said your scalars are in a structured grid, but 
the top of your data file says it is an unstructured grid. An unstructured grid 
can represent anything, so is there a possibility it does not represent the 
solid geometry you think it does? If you put a slice plane through it, does the 
slice and the fields on the slice look correct? Does it help if you run the 
"Clean to Grid" filter on the scalars?

I'm really just guessing at potential problems here. It would help if you could 
send some example data that exemplifies the problem.

-Ken


From: Richardson CFD <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:29 AM
To: Kenneth Moreland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] mapping scalars onto surface geometry


Thanks - yes the data-sets definitely overlap.  The STL surface (blue) is well 
within the scalar flow field (red).  The scalars (in the flow field) are just 
imported as a vtk file:
ASCII
DATASET UNSTRUCTURED_GRID

[Inline image 1]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Moreland, Kenneth 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That should work. Is it possible that the physical space of the two geometries 
do not overlap? Go to the information panel and look at the Bounds for the 
scalar field and the surface geometry. The bounds should overlap. If they do 
not, then you can use the Transform filter to move/scale one or both so that 
they are arranged in the same space.

-Ken


From: ParaView 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf 
of Richardson CFD <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 10:41 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] mapping scalars onto surface geometry

How do you map a scalar field onto a surface geometry (STL file) please?

I have a structured 3d array of values such as velocity, density, temperature 
etc...
and I want to map that onto a surface geometry, such as a motorbike for example.

I have tried the "Resample with Dataset" method,  (input=scalar field,  
source=surface geometry) but I'm just getting a null field (zeros) for 
whichever scalar I then select to display on the surface.

Thanks UFO-CFD
[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
    This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email>

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to