Could this just be a matter of representation? From the images it looks like in VisIt you are using the pseudocolor filter, which is just a surface representation colored by some scalar field (x_velocity, it looks like). In ParaView, you are applying the contour filter with a single value, and displaying the surface representation of that. I can't tell from the snapshot, but I am guessing that the representation of the square_nek5000 data set is set to outline, or possibly wireframe. If that is the case, try changing that to surface representation. You may then need to change the colorby selection to be x_velocity, if that is the variable you are interested in.
Hope that helps, joe On Sep 19, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Pradeep Jha wrote: I am outputting my data from Nek5000 in the case.fld* format. I am creating a case.nek5000 file which reads like: ==== filetemplate: case.fld%02d firsttimestep: 1 numtimesteps: 2 ==== When I am opening this *nek5000 file in Paraview 4.1, I don't see the contours. In Visit I see them (images attached). Any tips? <paraview.jpg><visit.jpg>_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
