Alberto, may I remind you of one simple thing... To the person reporting the bug, there is NO more important bug. You have to please 9 people to get a recommendation - only need to annoy one to get negative comments.
Just my thoughts. Phill. On 13 March 2014 19:12, Alberto Salvia Novella <es204904...@gmail.com>wrote: > While setting importances for around 200 bugs, I realized the papercut > definition was too complicated to be taken into practice by anyone, > including myself. So I've overly simplified it. > > A papercut is a software defect that is: > - insignificant. > - fixable by one person within a day. > - affecting the future release. > > What is to say, if you see something ridiculous affecting Trusty, please > mark it as affecting "One Hundred Papercuts". > > Regards <コ:彡 > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > ubuntu-qual...@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja Post to : papercuts-ninja@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
