event loop has NOTHING to do with ticks end of story ---- Best Regards, Dmitry Grinberg (847) 226 9295
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Darren Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thankyou very much, that has answered the question, > following on from that, > - it must be possible to get smaller divisions than one-hundredth, dependant > on the > the event-loop 'processing' speed and the specific device. Although > milli-seconds, > (one thousandth of a second), might not yet be possible using such > techniques. > regards > Darren > > --- On Mon, 17/11/08, Harald Schlangmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > From: Harald Schlangmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: AW: better timing than TimGetTick? > To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, 17 November, 2008, 5:38 PM > > Darren, > > > > don't know if I get your question right… > > > > The time the event loop takes for one loop differs by the work that is done… > A nilEvent will typically take less time (less than a tick) than e. g. a > redrawing (probably several ticks). > > As I wrote below, a tick in PalmOS is 1/100s, i. e. increments 100 times a > second, i. e. 100 Hz. > > > > Grüße, Harald > > - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.gps-laptimer.de > > > > Von: Darren Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 10:42 > An: Palm Developer Forum > Betreff: Re: better timing than TimGetTick? > > > > Query : > > is the event loop processing being timed at tick intervals, (1 loop pass per > tick), or > > at clock speed of the specific processor? > > > > regards > > Darren > > --- On Sat, 15/11/08, Dmitry Grinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Dmitry Grinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: better timing than TimGetTick? > To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, 15 November, 2008, 8:08 PM > > High-resolution Timers are avilable on all PXA devices. > > See Palm SDK folder "hirestimerlib" > > > > On 11/15/08, Harald Schlangmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> one tick is 1/100s. There is no better precision available in PalmOS. > >> > >> Grüße, Harald > >> > >> - > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://www.gps-laptimer.de > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Hynek Sladky > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 15. November 2008 17:47 > >> An: Palm Developer Forum > >> Betreff: better timing than TimGetTick? > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> I am porting one simulator app to PalmOS and I need to do real speed > >> simulation. But I am not able to do it with TimGetTick because it > >> usually takes less than one tick between two simulation steps. So I need > >> to know more accurate time (eg. microseconds). Final device will always > >> be OS5 (because of ARM native code of simulation core). > >> > >> Is there any way how to get such information? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Hynek Sladky > >> > >> -- > >> For information on > using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > >> please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > > please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ > >> > > > > > > -- > > ---- > > Best Regards, > > Dmitry Grinberg > > (847) 226 9295 > > > > -- > > For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > please > > see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ > > > > -- > > For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ > > -- > For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ > > -- > For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, > please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/ -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
