on 68k devices tick is 100Hz, on emulator it is 100Hz, on mac
simulator it is 60Hz, and in native arm mode it is 1000Hz
----
Best Regards,
Dmitry Grinberg
(847) 226 9295



On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Harald Schlangmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Darren,
>
>
>
> don't know if I get your question right…
>
>
>
> The time the event loop takes for one loop differs by the work that is done…
> A nilEvent will typically take less time (less than a tick) than e. g. a
> redrawing (probably several ticks).
>
> As I wrote below, a tick in PalmOS is 1/100s, i. e. increments 100 times a
> second, i. e. 100 Hz.
>
>
>
> Grüße, Harald
>
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.gps-laptimer.de
>
>
>
> Von: Darren Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2008 10:42
> An: Palm Developer Forum
> Betreff: Re: better timing than TimGetTick?
>
>
>
> Query :
>
> is the event loop processing being timed at tick intervals, (1 loop pass per
> tick), or
>
> at clock speed of the specific processor?
>
>
>
> regards
>
> Darren
>
> --- On Sat, 15/11/08, Dmitry Grinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Dmitry Grinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: better timing than TimGetTick?
> To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, 15 November, 2008, 8:08 PM
>
> High-resolution Timers are avilable on all PXA devices.
>
> See Palm SDK folder "hirestimerlib"
>
>
>
> On 11/15/08, Harald Schlangmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
>>
>
>>  one tick is 1/100s. There is no better precision available in PalmOS.
>
>>
>
>>  Grüße, Harald
>
>>
>
>>  -
>
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>  http://www.gps-laptimer.de
>
>>
>
>>  -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>
>>  Von: Hynek Sladky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>  Gesendet: Samstag, 15. November 2008 17:47
>
>>  An: Palm Developer Forum
>
>>  Betreff: better timing than TimGetTick?
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>  Hi,
>
>>  I am porting one simulator app to PalmOS and I need to do real speed
>
>>  simulation. But I am not able to do it with TimGetTick because it
>
>>  usually takes less than one tick between two simulation steps. So I need
>
>>  to know more accurate time (eg. microseconds). Final device will always
>
>>  be OS5 (because of ARM native code of simulation core).
>
>>
>
>>  Is there any way how to get such information?
>
>>
>
>>  Thanks,
>
>>  Hynek Sladky
>
>>
>
>>  --
>
>>  For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
>
>>  please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>  --
>
>>  For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
>
> please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ----
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dmitry Grinberg
>
> (847) 226 9295
>
>
>
> --
>
> For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
> please
>
> see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
>
>
>
> --
>
> For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
> please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
>
> --
> For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
> please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/

-- 
For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please 
see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/

Reply via email to