Whoops, looks like I misread Danny's posting.  He
wasn't suggesting that someone submit vnd.palm, he
was saying that they already had submitted it.

Mea culpa.

--
-Richard M. Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!


Richard Hartman wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>
>Adam Wozniak wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>
>>Richard Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> You could always use the "x-" non-standard extension mime type.
>>>
>>> Perhaps "application/x-palm-prc" and "application/x-palm-pdb".
>>> You can then have instructions on your site to tell people how to
>>> configure their browsers to handle these types.
>>
>>The drawback, of course, is that today half the media types I encounter
are
>"application/x-something", making the x- meaningless,
>
>howso meaningless?  it means what it means.
>
>>and pulling it into common usage.  "x-" means EXPERIMENTAL!
>
>no, what it means is "extension".  basically it designates a mime
>type that has not been "blessed" by the official registry.  anybody
>who agrees on what an x-something type is can make use of it
>without going through the bother of registering.  the downside is
>if two different groups of people have different ideas for an "x-"
>designation (e.g. "x-address-record").
>
>
>>What's the point of the x- if it falls into common usage?
>
>I don't even understand your point here.  "x-" serves
>a purpose ... so if a lot of people are using it for that
>purpose there is no point?  huh??
>
>>
>>Why not just register the darn thing?
>
>Well, you got me there.   It -would- be better to have
>a registered mime type.  Go right ahead.  This
>document describes the registration procedures:
>http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/MIME/2048/rfc2048.html
>
>Danny Epstein already noted that the appropriate
>type to register would be "application/vnd.palm"
>... although perhaps the hesitancy to register is based
>on how frequently this vendor has changed their name? :-P
>... perhaps "vnd.palmos" would be a better choice.
>
>
>--
>-Richard M. Hartman
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>
>
>
>
>





-- 
For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please 
see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/

Reply via email to