Yes thats what I meant, thanks very much for testing that. Oh darn I wonder why my code returns the OS version, but at least I know it is somthing in my code. Anyone else use this code without problem?
Chris Scott Johnson (Bellevue) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: Chris Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > is this code expected to return the application version number > > as set with constructor? On OS 3.2 it works but on OS 3.5 > > it returns what looks like the OS version (3.5.2). > > > > h = DmGetResource(verRsc, appVersionID); > > if (!h) h = DmGetResource(verRsc, appVersionAlternateID); > > Do you mean, is it supposed to return the version of your own app, or the > version of some other app that you have explicitly opened? > > If the former: your chunk of code returns my own app's version resource just > fine in OS 3.5. I didn't test the latter case. > > -slj- > > > > > -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
