Am 22.07.2016 um 09:39 schrieb Sergey Kondakov: > VLC and mpv aren't the only packages depending on it, you know ! But then > again, > we're talking about the people who seem to removed 32bit gstreamer packages > from > Packman's TW repo even though wine's A/V capabilities are dependant upon > them.
Whats the story with gstreamer-32bit? It looks like Leap wont have them due to the lack of i586 target. That can be added, and I think I did add it a few months ago for a few packages. Not sure if the publisher would be able to deal with the -32bit packages. This can probably be fixed. I will try once more. The TW and 13.x repos have a i586 target so -32bit packages do exist. Are they functional in the wine environment? > And because of things like that whole wine bugtracker is filled with > complaints > for years ( https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9127 ) from users who's > distribution doesn't build it properly. Goodbye, pre-rendered cutscenes in > games > and multimedia applications in general. Which comment in that bug contains the fix to be applied by the gstreamer maintainers in OBS and/or packman? > Why the hell there is there "Factory" and "TW" repoes with different > configuration and packages ? Which one a normal person should use ? Factory turned into a compile-test-only repo since TW is a rolling release. It was already suggested a few times to "unpublish" Factory from the mirrors. > You both, TW team and Packman team, are at fault here. I'm sure the pkg maintainers of packman do only a subset of their mistakes on purpose. > * Link ffmpeg and gstreamer and any other > framework for each distro independently. This is done since last week for TW and 42.2. Olaf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
