https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430713
--- Comment #7 from Georg Sauthoff <[email protected]> --- Ok, I updated the spec file: Spec URL: https://codeberg.org/gms/fedora-pkg-submission/raw/commit/ee1221c804171003d9eb64d8081f8c8b64f2d400/libcpucycles.spec SRPM URL: https://georg.so/pub/libcpucycles-20260105-1.fc43.src.rpm Spec Diff: https://codeberg.org/gms/fedora-pkg-submission/commit/ee1221c804171003d9eb64d8081f8c8b64f2d400 The koji builds look fine. The glob for the shared library is now more specific. I've dropped the CC0-1.0 license tag. Wasn't sure how complete the license expression has to be, since upstream does include CC0-1.0. However, the omission doesn't really matter since in both versions the license expression evaluates to true under the Fedora license requirements. Also updated the summary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430713 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202430713%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
