https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2432575

Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> ---
> There is no need for a %check.

That was my mistake; I accidentally copied one more line from rpmlint.

> The patch warnings are false positives (they're applied without using the 
> macros).

Ah, I see. I somehow did not notice.

> I contacted the upstream for the Artistic 1.0 component and they agreed to 
> permit distribution under Artistic 2.0. Documentation included.

And you included the communication as SourceX with the name
uwmslide-Artistic-2.0-license-permission.pdf in the src.rpm. Nice. 
This is a prime example of how to proceed correctly. I thank both to you and
Eric.

The package is

APPROVED


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2432575

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202432575%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to