https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2419808
--- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson <[email protected]> --- > Alternatively: I am wondering why binwalk even uses this crate. There's no > trail in the commit log for *why* it was chosen, it's just added in the > initial import of the Rust rewrite. y I'm not really involved in the upstream so I'm not able to answer that. I took on the Fedora maintainership as it's something I use in the IoT ecosystem in Fedora. > The crc32fast crate has almost 1000x (!) more downloads from crates.io. > Maybe binwalk can switch to that one? Again being a consumer of binwalk I am not the person to make that arguement upstream, would appreciate if you took that discussion upstream as you're by far the expert in the details. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2419808 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202419808%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
