https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840
--- Comment #24 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #23) > It looks like the submitter of the original review request is still working > on it, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030#c66. Perhaps you > could ask the reviewer in that bug what’s still required for approval. If > the reviewer is no longer interested, you could even offer to take over the > review. > > I hope that a way can be found to get this package across the “finish line,” > one way or another. To be honest, after reading the reply from the other review, I shall be pushing forward with this submission. Reasons: * I plan to package splash that depends on giza. * EPEL is the end goal for both packages. * Requirement of high package quality. * Responsive maintenance. If the other developer wishes to co-maintain with me once in Fedora, I would be happy to discuss it. Regards Phil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202414840%23c24 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
