https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
Joachim Frieben <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jfrieben@hotmail. | |com) | --- Comment #66 from Joachim Frieben <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #65 Why would packaging go on elsewhere when the present package is in a mature shape, and when the bug report does not mandate any further modification required by the packaging guidelines? As an upstream contributor and long-time user of Fedora, I am quite satisfied with the package, and COPR builds have been provided reliably for a long time. The assignee has raised some cosmetic issues but those should become obsolete or may be implemented when the next release by upstream justifies an new build. If the other submitter wants to push his own package for whatever reason he has any freedom to do so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201187030%23c66 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
