https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366696
--- Comment #8 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- The test262 archive has an “overall” license of BSD-3-Clause, and some files are MPL-2.0. Those are fine, and it’s correct that these aren’t listed in the License since the test suite doesn’t contribute to the licenses of the binary RPMs. However, there is also a PDF copy of ECMA TR-104, with the following license on page iv (PDF page 6): ---------- "COPYRIGHT NOTICE © 2016 Ecma International This document may be copied, published and distributed to others, and certain derivative works of it may be prepared, copied, published, and distributed, in whole or in part, provided that the above copyright notice and this Copyright License and Disclaimer are i ncluded on all such copies and derivative works. The only derivative works that are permissible under this Copyright License and Disclaimer are: (i) works which incorporate all or portion of this document for the purpose of providing commentary or explanation (such as an annotated version of the document), (ii) works which incorporate all or portion of this document for the purpose of incorporating features that provide accessibility, (iii) translations of this document into languages other than English an d into different formats and (iv) works by making use of this specification in standard conformant products by implementing (e.g. by copy and paste wholly or partly) the functionality therein. However, the content of this document itself may not be modified in any way, including by removing the copyright notice or references to Ecma International, except as required to translate it into languages other than English or into a different format. The official version of an Ecma International document is the English language version on the Ecma International website. In the event of discrepancies between a translated version and the official version, the official version shall govern. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by Ecma International or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and ECMA INTERNATIONAL DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE." ---------- This seems like it *might* be a potentially-acceptable documentation license, but I couldn’t find a match for it among the licenses in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/#_allowed_documentation_licenses, and I’m not sure it has an SPDX identifier. Even though this PDF file isn’t packaged in the binary RPMs, anything in the source RPMs is still redistributed, and needs to be under a license acceptable for Fedora. You’ll need to submit this license for review as a documentation license at https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues. If approved, all is well; if not acceptable, you’ll need to strip this file out of the test262 archive *before* uploading to the lookaside cache. You can write a script to handle that and include it as an additional source, or write down instructions for doing it manually in a comment in the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366696 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202366696%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
