https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414530
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > For what it's worth, this *was* intentional. But it's probably fine. I am not aware of the history here, but I don't see a reason for it *now*? > We need "Provides: rust-packaging" or we're going to have a problem even > between RHEL and Fedora. > Sorry, I mean we cannot ever remove the "Provides: rust-packaging" because of > RHEL. I'm not sure this is the case? The RPM tooling for Rust packages is in "rust-toolset" in RHEL, which is built from the "rust" source package. Neither are related to the "rust-packaging" name. There are still hundreds of Fedora packages that use "BuildRequires: rust-packaging" though, just because they were generated by a version of rust2rpm that didn't yet use the new package name. So the Provides won't go away until all those are regenerated with recent rust2rpm and use "BR: cargo-rpm-macros" instead. So for both your points, I would need actionable information before I can adapt this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414530 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202414530%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
