https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231216
--- Comment #15 from Tadej Janež <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ryan from comment #14) > How about just a `Conflicts` line? It seems like the original par2cmdline is > sort of being maintained again with a new 1.0.0 release, and > par2cmdline-turbo's author has stated in > https://github.com/animetosho/par2cmdline-turbo/issues/41 that > > > I'd say the upstream project is more aimed at being a 'reference' > > implementation of PAR2, instead of targeting platform specific > > optimisations for performance like this fork is. > So I expect that this fork will continue to exist, as the goals of this and > par2cmdline are a little different. I agree, both implementations have their place and I could imagine both being installed at the same time to do e.g. benchmark comparison between the two implementations. Hence, I'm not in favor of adding 'Conflicts' but rather renaming par2cmdline-turbo's binary to e.g. par2turbo (and helpers to par2turbo-create, par2turbo-repair and par2turbo-verify). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231216 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202231216%23c15 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
