https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2397831

            Bug ID: 2397831
           Summary: Review Request: texlive-scheme-gust - GUST TeX Live
                    scheme
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
        QA Contact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-scheme-gust.spec
SRPM URL:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-scheme-gust-svn59755-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description:
GUST TeX Live scheme This is the GUST TeX Live scheme: it is a set of files
sufficient to typeset Polish plain TeX, LaTeX and ConTeXt documents in
PostScript or PDF.

Fedora Account System Username: spot

This package is part of an effort to modularize and more completely package
TeXLive in Fedora, starting with TL2025. A copr with F43 and Rawhide builds for
this package (and the rest of the package set) can be found here:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive-2025/

The use of a high epoch is intentional, this is the legacy of TeXLive, and it
ensures consistency in dependencies and forcing upgrades.

All of the "scheme" packages are metapackages. TeXLive uses "schemes" to
recommend specific sets of "collections" to be installed, and "collections" are
made up of specific TeX components. Accordingly, all "scheme" packages have no
sources, build nothing, and install nothing. They are separated out because
TeXLive can change what goes into a "scheme" and/or rename a "collection".

Fun trivia fact: GUST is the name of the Polish TeX Users Group, created in
1992. They're also responsible for a _lot_ of the excellent fonts in TeX, and
they have a scheme named after them today. Isn't it cool how small things have
big impacts and how open source names provide a sense of legacy? Like creating
a whole set of licensing data, schema, and names and then having someone else
name it after you after it's obsolete? Anyways.

Bonus: This should be a really easy review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2397831

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202397831%23c0

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to