https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297308
--- Comment #12 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- > b) Can the directories be co-owned, expect would need to add Indeed, I've add the owning of `%{_libexecdir}/bash-preexec`. For `profile.d`, do we need to co-own it? It is part of the default system, and it seems that there are other packages that own it that would make more sense. > a) How do you ensure no other packages that use `DEBUG` or `PROMPT_COMMAND` > are not installed? Oh, good point. There is no standard, but I believe we can introduce a `Provides` and `Conflicts`, as shown in this talk [1]. I will add it as `bash(PROMPT_COMMAND)`, but the other packages that provide it would have to include it as well. I will open a ML thread to discuss this. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hPpKJMyD08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297308 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202297308%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
