https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373038



--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
Thank you for your comments!

> 1- You might want to implement fdupes in your spec. Adding it as a BR and 
> doing %fdupes %{buildroot} will find all the duplicate files and symlink 
> them, lowering the file size.

Why? I'm not aware of any large number of "duplicate" files in this package.
Additionally, the current implementation of %fdupes is brittle and causes
non-reproducible package builds, so I would rather avoid it unless it really
provides big benefits.

> 2- This should probably be looked into: E: incorrect-fsf-address 
> /usr/share/licenses/elementary-photos/COPYING (At least a PR might be a good 
> idea)

Thanks, I'll report this upstream. It shouldn't be a blocker though.

> 3- The following should probably be added as Requires:

As far as I can tell, this is just a weird way that meson prints output when
looking for dependencies.

The executable in this package already dynamically links to all these
libraries, so RPM already generates explicit Requires for all of them (as you
can see from the build.log or the Requires in the fedora-review.txt).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373038

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202373038%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to