https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369464
--- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- > a) Tutorial has a different license: > https://github.com/scipopt/PySCIPOpt/blob/master/examples/tutorial/logical.py#L9 > https://github.com/scipopt/PySCIPOpt/blob/master/examples/tutorial/even.py#L4 Thanks for catching this! The brief phrase “Public Domain, WTFNMFPL Public Licence” is surprisingly messy. It seems like this is a conflation of the WTFNMFPL with a public-domain dedication, which isn’t necessarily quite right, rather than an attempt to dual-license the files. If it were truly a public-domain dedication, it would need to be validated and added to https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/public-domain-text.txt. Meanwhile, the WTFNMFPL, https://github.com/adversary-org/wtfnmf/blob/master/COPYING.WTFNMFPL, has not been evaluated for allowability in Fedora, and is not even in SPDX yet. It may be best for me to submit this new license for review and, at the same time, submit a version of those package with a modified source archive that has those files filtered out, so that this package is not blocked on license review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369464 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202369464%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
