https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080130
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #8) > Comments: > a) Documentation introduces a number of javascript files which will likely > be replicated on each install. Yea, the duplication is a bit inefficient alas: possibly we could use symlinks, but again symlinks can fail under an http server etc. Unfortunately I don't think upstream has any plans to address this, but if you have an idea how to improve the Fedora situation in a simple way we could try to experiment perhaps. My main concern is just it is a hard to test broadly and it might be easy to break many packages if messed up. Then again most people just read the library docs (haddocks) online... > It seems docbook was used before: As I recall docbook was only used for GHC compiler documentation, now mostly replaced by sphinx I believe. > c) Consider using %autorelease and %autochangelog macros Yep thanks I like to do the switch when importing - though maybe I should just bite the bullet and do it for reviews too > e) Review of: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368535 (see my preceding comment, thanks :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080130 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202080130%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
