https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364403



--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík <[email protected]> ---
There are quite a lot of complaints on duplicated files in generated
libdmrconf-doc package, which is even 100MB large and architecture specific.

It might be reduced by removing duplicate and replacing it with symlink.

fdupes -r rpms-unpacked/libdmrconf-doc-0.12.1-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm/ -m
922 duplicate files (in 922 sets), occupying 2.8 megabytes

rpmlint creates a lot of warnings about it, might be worth solving by
after-process somehow. But their size does not seem significant.

libdmrconf-doc.x86_64: E: no-binary
libdmrconf-doc.x86_64: E: files-duplicated-waste 2826520

If possible, common data should be in noarch doc package. If there are any
differences, those might be part of devel package. I expect just few files
might be arch-dependent, if any.

Requires:       libdmrconf{?_isa} = %{version}
I think also release should be included in above Requires for %package -n
libdmrconf-doc and %package devel. Common usage is %{version}-%{release}, is
there any secific reason why is not release included?

There are few unowned directories:

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d,
     /usr/lib/udev, /usr/share/doc/libdmrconf

Depending on systemd-udev should fix first 2, %files -n libdmrconf-doc should
own directory without html too.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364403

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202364403%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to