https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358292

Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
Hm, the data/* files exclusively contain generated code, not "data" per se.

Not sure *what* they're generated from, but it doesn't look like the code for
generating these files is part of the published crate,
which would be a violation of the rules here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#pregenerated-code

And I'm a little bit unsure whether we've already encountered issues with
endianness in API calls like this one?

> zerovec::ZeroVec::from_bytes_unchecked(b"am\0ar\0as\0balbe\0bg\0bgcbhobn\0brxchrcswcv...")


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358292

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202358292%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to