https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071
Ben Beasley <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(code@musicinmybra | |in.net) --- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- Sorry, I didn’t realize I never finished this review. I’ll review the updated submission ASAP. > What about packages that use Versioneer prior to the switch to Unlicense > (<0.27)? Would I have to add "AND CC0-1.0"? I believe I maintain a couple of > packages using Versioneer. So far, I have never paid attention to the license > of _version.py nor to which version of Versioneer is shipped in the sources > if any. Yes, technically, as I understand it, Versioneer has been LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain, then CC0-1.0, and then Unlicense, in different versions, and the generated _version.py files have always had the same licenses as the copy of Versioneer that generated them. I don’t think that making a mistake here has much consequence since these are all ultra-permissive and the _version.py files are so trivial that it’s questionable whether they contain anything copyrightable, but I do *try* to get this right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202323071%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
