https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332550
--- Comment #9 from Cole Robinson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Uri Lublin from comment #6) > > Does the package build without the un-reviewed cvm/vtpm bits enabled? If > > it's simple to drop those, maybe do that, and then enable them in a follow > > up commit once packages land, so this package isn't blocked. > > It can be built with an added patch to remove the Azure attesters, so that > only snp-attester is enabled, or by modifying > 0006-Fedora-attester-pick-attesters-in-all-attesters.patch > diff --git a/attestation-agent/attester/Cargo.toml > b/attestation-agent/attester/Cargo.toml > index 4e16347..1451560 100644 > --- a/attestation-agent/attester/Cargo.toml > +++ b/attestation-agent/attester/Cargo.toml > @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ required-features = ["bin"] > [features] > default = ["all-attesters"] > all-attesters = [ > - "az-snp-vtpm-attester", > - "az-tdx-vtpm-attester", > "snp-attester", > ] snp-attester is enough for initial package review IMO, that's useful functionality on its own. Will let you parallellize the review process a bit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332550 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202332550%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
