https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327650
Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- I would prefer if you did not use sed to patch Cargo.toml. It makes it really hard to debug ("did this sed actually do anything?") and makes it hard for other people to contribute to the package. Though I think there is a mode for sed that makes it fail if the expression doesn't match any line in the file? Using this would make this at least a bit better. This is not a package for a "crate" so you don't necessarily need to re-generate the spec file with rust2rpm for every version, and most Cargo.toml patches won't affect the generated spec file. So if you make sed calls that don't make any changes fail, I think that would be "ok" (though I would still prefer using a patchset, similar to what we do in ruff, uv, or maturin). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327650 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202327650%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
