https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330591
--- Comment #5 from David Sommerseth <[email protected]> --- I've done a Fedora Copr build on x86_64 only here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dsommers/sandbox/build/8347734/ Regarding the shared library ... %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.* From what I see glib2 is doing, they ship the *.so link (it's not a file) in -devel, but the *so.* files in the main glib2 package. I'm doing the same here as well. To me this makes sense, as binaries depending on libgdbus/libglib-2.0/libgio-2.0 depends on the corresponding *.so.* files. While the -devel package ships the *.so link, pointing at the corresponding *.so.* file - which is why there is a hard version dependency between the main package and the -devel package (%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}). Or did I misunderstand you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330591 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202330591%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
