https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317585
--- Comment #8 from Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> --- To answer one item: ``` [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python Please re-read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/ I'm noticing things like the use of %{python3_pkgversion} when it should be %{python3_version} or %{python3_version_nodots}. I also wonder why you didn't use %pyproject_buildrequires techniques. We should use those if it's possible. ``` I tried using %{python3_version} in replacement of %{python3_pkgversion} and it did not work in `mock` but it would work in `rpmbuild`. I then downloaded all the Fedora spec files to see what was being used in rawhide, and found that packages like python3-wheel and others still used the _pkgversion syntax. I was also having problems trying to use %pyproject_buildrequires and they were causing different errors depending if I was using epel-9 or fedora-rawhide. I will need to work with the upstream to get the requirements and other tooling to work correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317585 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202317585%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
