https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121490
--- Comment #31 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > It seems to be a bug-fix patch for the official package. Yes, because sodiumoxide is archived and abandoned. :) > I would still need all the dependencies of sodiumoxide - which is the hard > part. I don't think it would be hard - they're literally all already available in Fedora. > So ideally, the sodiumoxide package could include the bugfix patches from > cjdns. This is true, that would be another solution, but you'd need to patch cjdns to use it instead of the git snapshot they're referencing now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121490 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202121490%23c31 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
