https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264719
--- Comment #22 from Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> --- > But there is a more fundamental question, `ble.sh` supports internal > updates[1]. Do we keep that functionality as-is, or do we patch it out? My view is that it is "not supported". I.e. if user try to active, it will fail for him with permissions error. I do not think we need to patch it out. At least for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264719 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202264719%23c22 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
