https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760
--- Comment #10 from Neel Chauhan <[email protected]> --- I feel versioning libraries doesn't make sense here, as the build system won't allow it. Samba doesn't version on Fedora either: $ ls -l /usr/lib64/samba -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 61712 Aug 16 20:00 libaddns-private-samba.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 187152 Aug 16 20:00 libads-private-samba.so ... -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 7672 Aug 16 20:00 libutil-setid-private-samba.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 12696 Aug 16 20:00 libutil-tdb-private-samba.so And Samba is a **major** FOSS project. However, I am not sure if the rules are different and whatnot. But regardless, accel-ppp is a hard project to package. There's a reason why there's why only Alpine packaged accel-ppp afaict. About my updated specs: Spec URL: https://neelc.org/fedora/accel-ppp/r4/accel-ppp.spec SRPM URL: https://neelc.org/fedora/accel-ppp/r4/accel-ppp-1.13.0-1.fc42.src.rpm Patch0: https://neelc.org/fedora/accel-ppp/r4/0001-Use-PCRE2-instead-of-PCRE.patch Patch1: https://neelc.org/fedora/accel-ppp/r4/0002-Add-Fedora-CPack-option.patch Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123906657 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202309760%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
