https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539
--- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- > - Do the paraview packages also need to be split into -openmpi/-mpich > sub-packages? I think that there is little reason to split the paraview plugins, because it’s small (in file size and number of files), and more importantly it doesn’t depend on any of the MPI implementations, so we can install all three versions/copies of the paraview plugin without dragging in any extra dependencies. If the plugin linked the MPI libraries, it would be different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283539%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
