https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448
--- Comment #13 from Ming Lei <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #12) > > # FIXME: paste output of %%cargo_license_summary here > > Please read this line and do what it says. > Then I can tell you what the correct license tag would be ... OK, the macro collects licence from all dependent crates, follows the result: # 0BSD OR MIT OR Apache-2.0 # Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0 # Apache-2.0 OR MIT # Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT # BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT # BSD-3-Clause # GPL-2.0-or-later # MIT # MIT OR Apache-2.0 # MIT OR Zlib OR Apache-2.0 # MPL-2.0+ # Unlicense OR MIT So the correct answer is to combine the above all with AND? Just wondering why 'rust2rpm -V' doesn't figure it out and fill up in .spec automaically? At least it may provide a hint. Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202308448%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
