https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303167



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Steffan <[email protected]> ---
Issues:
=======
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/carbon-c-relay
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

This is fine as this review is an un-retire review.


[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
     "Apache License 2.0", "Apache License 2.0 [generated file]", "FSF
     Unlimited License (with License Retention) [generated file]", "GNU
     General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General
     Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated
     file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License
     v2.0 or later", "Public domain". 154 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jon/Reviews/carbon-c-
     relay/licensecheck.txt
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

Only Apache-2.0 is addressed. I think we need to add the non-generated licenses
and license files.

[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

Check is disabled and the referenced issue has been resolved. Please enable
tests again and open a new issue if there are still actually issues.

carbon-c-relay.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl
/usr/bin/carbon-c-relay SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list

This indicates the system crypto policy is not being used. This should be
resolved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303167

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202303167%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to