https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302515
--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- Thanks again for the preliminary/unofficial review! Note that to do a full review, you would need to go through everything fedora-review did not have an opinion on ([ ]) and evaluate it yourself. It’s also good to double-check the list of installed files, the final Requires, and any rpmlint remssages for sanity, skim the spec file for anything “weird,” and do a check (mostly using licensecheck.txt from the review directory) for any additional licenses or bundled libraries that the submitter might have missed. For fedora-review messages like Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/lib, /usr/share, /usr/lib/python3.13, /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages, /usr see https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/515. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302515 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202302515%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
