https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Cristian Le from comment #12) > But what about any fixes/changes that are introduced in > importlib_resources>=6.0 which correspond to Python3.13 [1], for example > [2]. What I'm trying to say is that this package should not be treated any > differently from `importlib_metadata` or `typing_extensions`. I see. You explicitly mentioned Python<3.12. I guess it's unavoidable to introduce it if upstreams depend on it :/ > Regarding Python<3.12, this is still needed for EPEL9. Yeah, for EPEL, it makes perfect sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201772578%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
