https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297307
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > Any suggestions on what to do on that front? Send a message to the legal@ mailing list. I am really unsure how this should be handled. > Roger, I don't see a mechanism in `rust2rpm.toml` so I guess I would do it > manually. Correct (for now). > I am considering the `Summary` to be just "Rust implementation of BIP-0039" Summary: Rust implementation of BIP-0039 would be kind-of-good, but it is still meaningless if you don't know what a "BIP" (let alone "BIP-0039") is. but maybe that's OK. > wdyt? Probably getting rid of the last sentence of the abstract. I'm not sure editing the description is worth it. These packages aren't shipped to users after all. So it will only show when people for example visit src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tiny-bip39 or packages.fedoraproject.org. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202297307%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
