https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291346



--- Comment #6 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> ---
> For me it would mean extra work for no advantage. Why would you like that?

If the project moves to dynamic-version, the PyPI source is guaranteed to work.
Currently EPEL9 does not work with dynamic versioning even when
`.git_archival.txt` is included appropriately.

> As for the tags, they are there but no zip releases. Following a git seems to 
> be most flexible, especially that other packages from this author can be 
> tracked by git commit only.

You have git archives, e.g.:
https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-client/releases/tag/v0.5.13

If you want it to be more flexible, than how about forge_meta [1]?

> I'm not sure. I've never did that. I don't want to go down on strange errors 
> because the author tested it on aw-server and I did that on aw-server-rust 
> and something doesn't pass the test.

Well even with that, the author chose to use `input()` to block the automated
testing so it's rather hard to implement regardless. Hopefully there are other
projects that can do integration tests for it, or just cross_fingers and test
live on users :D.

[1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291346

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202291346%23c6
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to