https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281419
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #2) > May consider putting petite in a separate sub package, see for example: > https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/packages/chezscheme/ > files/chezscheme.spec Okay thanks - though I am not really sure if this "optimization" makes sense for this new package at this point. If there are use cases I would be happy/open to that certainly: I am relatively new to chez-scheme though. Also their petite subpackage seems missing the real files... > Should the license file be packaged? See > https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme/blob/main/LICENSE Thank you good catch oops - I think inherited. > Some of the files seem to be under other licenses: > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/%40fedora-review/fedora- > review-2281419-chez-scheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07460303-chez-scheme/fedora- > review/licensecheck.txt Thanks (there is quite a bit of noise there, since I am using the system zlib and lz4 libraries) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202281419%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
