https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276561
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > License: MPL-2.0 > # LICENSE.dependencies contains a full license breakdown This is still not correct. The output of %cargo_license_summary is: ``` # (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause # Apache-2.0 OR MIT # MIT # MIT OR Apache-2.0 # MPL-2.0 ``` So the license for the binary subpackage should be: ``` # (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause # Apache-2.0 OR MIT # MIT # MIT OR Apache-2.0 # MPL-2.0 License: MPL-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) # LICENSE.dependencies contains a full license breakdown ``` Again, do you need the crate for its library interface, or do you have a use for the "onenote-parse" executable too? If the answer is no, it would be easier long-term to not package the executable. Looking at the code, it looks more like a toy example than an actually usable program. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276561 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202276561%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
