https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333
Ben Beasley <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- Is there a specific reason for using the “traditional” snapshot versioning style https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots_2 Version: 7.0.0 Release: 2.%{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} rather than the current style? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots Version: 7.0.0^%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit} Release: 2%{?dist} I also notice that, while the guidelines for the old snapshot information field in the release only have “suggested” formats, - YYYYMMDD.<revision> - YYYYMMDD<scm><revision> the ones for the new snapshot information field in the version say one of the following formats “should” be followed: - <date>.<revision> - <date><scm><revision> - <number>.<revision> - <number>.<scm><revision> %{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} is <date>.<scm><revision>, which doesn’t exactly match any of these formats. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279333%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
