https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279272



--- Comment #8 from Felix Wang <[email protected]> ---
Thanks for the review by you both.

> This should be dropped and "BuildArch: noarch" should be used instead.

Done.

> This should use the modern snapshot versioning rather than the legacy 
> version-in-release variant. The version is wrong too, since the pkgconfig 
> file says it's "1.0".
> Cf. 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots

There is no tag version release on the upstream, so I use "Version:
0^%{date}git%{shortcommit}"

> When upstream has never chosen a version, you must use Version: 0.


> This should be simplified to "%{_datadir}/wlr-protocols/" (note the trailing 
> slash)

Done.


Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/wlr-protocols.spec
SRPM URL:
https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/wlr-protocols-0%5e20240126git2b8d433-1.fc39.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279272

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279272%23c8
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to