https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856



--- Comment #3 from Jerry James <[email protected]> ---
Thank you for the review, Matthieu.

(In reply to Matthieu Saulnier from comment #2)
> I see 4 issues in the package:
> 
> [!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>      names). See below:
> 
> - The Name: tag is not using %{pkgname} macro (like in your other package)

That isn't what "consistently uses macros" means.  As the parenthetical remark
indicates, it's talking about using %{_bindir} instead of "/usr/bin",
%{_libdir} instead of "/usr/lib" or "/usr/lib64", etc.  Nevertheless, you are
correct that I have written "Name: gap-pkg-%{pkgname}" in other gap spec files,
so I should be consistent with myself. :-)  Fixed.

> - in %%install section: src/fplsa4.ini
> 
> - in %%files section, macro again: %{pkgname}4.ini

Hmmm, %files has "%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fplsa4.ini" in my copy. 
Did I upload a version that has "%{pkgname}4.ini"?  In any case, the version I
just uploaded consistently uses the name "fplsa4.ini" everywhere.

> Also, the doc package seems to be empty, this is an explanation why:

Oops!  Yes, %gap_copy_docs needs a -n argument.  Fixed.

The new spec and source rpm files are at the same URLs as above.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270856%23c3
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to