https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252763
--- Comment #24 from Michal Schorm <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23) > You should also drop everything related to s390, we don't offer that 32(ish) > bit architecture anymore. Okay. I also noticed, I use the '%{arm}' macro on few places. | rpm --eval %{arm} | armv3l armv4b armv4l armv4tl armv5tl armv5tel armv5tejl armv6l armv6hl armv7l armv7hl armv7hnl armv8l armv8hl armv8hnl armv8hcnl The macro doesn't contain the "aarch*" ARM architectures. So I assume I should get rid of the '%{arm}' too, as it only covers architectures we don't offer. (leaving behind only the 'aarch64' and 's390x' strings) Is that right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252763 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202252763%23c24 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
