https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948



--- Comment #9 from Daniel Mellado <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #7)
> That sounds good to me, however you will still need to verify that the
> vendor tarball contains only permissible content: see point 2 in my previous
> comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948#c3
> 
> This will likely require at least some amount of modifying and / or patching
> the sources of some vendored dependencies, similar to what we do in the
> Fedora package for the fiat-crypto crate. I have not done a complete audit
> of the vendor tarball though, so there is likely other stuff that would need
> to be cleaned up for legal reasons.

Thanks, that make sense, we'll take a look at that crate but, are there any
specific guidelines for this audit to be done?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257948%23c9
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to